@article {1030,
	title = {A Decade of Solid Oxide Electrolysis Improvements at DTU Energy},
	journal = {ECS Transactions},
	volume = {75},
	year = {2017},
	note = {{\textquoteright}doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01132\n - I.Am.Hydrogen{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}\n - jyoungstrom{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}Jason thinks this is great.\n~\n - jyoungstrom{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}\n - estechel{\textquoteright}
},
	pages = {3-14},
	abstract = {Published on January 11th, 2017.
Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) can efficiently convert electrical energy (e.g. surplus wind power) to energy stored in fuels such as hydrogen or other synthetic fuels. Performance and durability of the SOEC has increased orders of magnitudes within the last decade. This paper presents a short review of the R\&D work on SOEC single cells conducted at DTU Energy from 2005 to 2015. The SOEC improvements have involved increasing the of the oxygen electrode performance, elimination of impurities in the feed streams, optimization of processing routes, and fuel electrode structure optimization. All together, these improvements have led to a decrease in long-term degradation rate from ~40 \%/kh to ~0.4 \%/kh for steam electrolysis at -1 A/cm2, while the initial area specific resistance has been decreased from 0.44 Wcm2 to 0.15 Wcm2 at -0.5 A/cm2 and 750 {\textdegree}C.},
	issn = {1938-6737, 1938-5862},
	doi = {10.1149/07542.0003ecst},
	url = {http://ecst.ecsdl.org/content/75/42/3},
	author = {Anne Hauch and Karen Brodersen and Ming Chen and Christopher Graves and S{\o}ren H{\o}jgaard Jensen and Peter Stanley J{\o}rgensen and Peter Vang Hendriksen and Mogens Bjerg Mogensen and Simona Ovtar and Xiufu Sun}
}
@article {1032,
	title = {Quality Assurance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and Electrolyser (SOEC) Stacks},
	journal = {ECS Transactions},
	volume = {78},
	note = {{\textquoteright}doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01132\n - I.Am.Hydrogen{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}\n - jyoungstrom{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}Jason thinks this is great.\n~\n - jyoungstrom{\textquoteright}
{\textquoteright}\n - estechel{\textquoteright}
},
	pages = {2077-2086},
	abstract = {In the EU-funded project {\textquotedblleft}Solid oxide cell and stack testing and quality assurance{\textquotedblright} (SOCTESQA) standardized and industry wide test modules and programs for high temperature solid oxide cells and stacks are being developed. These test procedures can be applied for the fuel cell (SOFC), the electrolysis (SOEC) and in the combined SOFC/SOEC mode. In order to optimize the test modules the project partners have tested identical SOC stacks with the same test programs in several testing campaigns. Altogether 10 pre-normative test modules were developed: Start-up, current-voltage characteristics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, reactant utilization, reactant gas composition, temperature sensitivity, operation at constant current, operation at varying current, thermal cycling and shut-down. The test modules were validated by comparing the results in terms of repeatability of the different testing campaigns and in terms of reproducibility among the different partners. Moreover, the results are discussed in context to the test input parameters.},
	issn = {1938-6737, 1938-5862},
	doi = {10.1149/07801.2077ecst},
	url = {http://ecst.ecsdl.org/content/78/1/2077},
	author = {Michael Lang and Corinna Auer and Karine Couturier and Xiufu Sun and Stephen J. McPhail and Thomas Malkow and Qingxi Fu and Qinglin Liu}
}
